Haynes v. Tulsa Public Schools Transit
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
On January 4, 1994, the trial judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court entered and mailed an order denying Claimant any benefits. On January 24, 1994, at 5:05 p.m. the Claimant’s petition for review was hand-delivered to a member of the Court Clerk’s staff. The computer records of the Clerk’s office disclose that the required $200 cost deposit was not received until the next day. Respondent moves to dismiss the petition for review as untimely.
Any Workers’ Compensation Court litigant desiring to appeal an order of that Court must, within 20 days after a copy of the decision…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister QuikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Davuluri v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & SupervisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Haynes v. Tulsa Public Schools TransitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister QuikSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.