Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister Quik

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1996No. 83283Published

1Opinion of the Court

915 P.2d 355 (1996)

Judy JOHNSON, Petitioner,

v.

TONY'S TOWN MISTER QUIK and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.

No. 83283.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

April 9, 1996.

Joseph F. Bufogle, Bufogle and Associates, Tulsa, for Petitioner.

Robert Highsaw, State Insurance Fund, Oklahoma City, for Respondents.

OPALA, Justice.

The single issue tendered by Tony's Town Mister Quik's [respondent or employer] quest for dismissal is whether the claimant's petition for review can be deemed filed when mailed and hence timely. We answer in the affirmative and deny the motion to dismiss with prejudice to renewal.

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API