Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tony's Town Mister Quik

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1996No. 83283PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The single issue tendered by Tony’s Town Mister Quik’s [respondent or employer] quest for dismissal is whether the claimant’s petition for review can be deemed filed when mailed and hence timely. We answer in the affirmative and deny the motion to dismiss with prejudice to renewal.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

Judy Johnson [claimant or Johnson] filed her Form 3 for cumulative-trauma injury occasioned by on-the-job stress. The trial tribunal heard the case on February 17,1994 and entered its order denying the claim on February 28. A copy of the tribunal’s memorial was sent to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Brown v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. World Publishing Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision v. PinarocSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality v. Department of Central ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API