Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lang v. Erlanger Tubular Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 2009No. 105513Published

1DissentOpala, J.

T1 Today's opinion sustains the Workers' Compensation Court's denial of the worker's claim as untimely. Its pronouncement rests on a construction of the provisions of 85 O.S.Supp.2005 48(C).1 The court rejects claimant's reliance upon the employer's act of tolling2 the 3-year time bar, effected by its voluntary payment for claimant's medical care after the limitation period's expiration.

1 2 It is my view that the employer's act of payment here in contest operated to erase the limitation's time bar and to restart the § 48(C) period. I hence recede from the court's pronouncement. I would vacate…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API