In Re Ullman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, M. Robert Ullman, appeals pro se from the order entered in the Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, which denied and dismissed Appellant’s petition for approval of his private criminal complaint. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural history of the appeal as follows:
The matter before the [c]ourt is the Petitioners’, Canoe Manufacturing Company (“Canoe”) and [Appellant],[ 1 ] Petition for Court Review in Accordance with Rule 506(B)(2) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure (Approval of Private…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MalloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MuroskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VurimindiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In Re: Private Criminal Complaint D. MilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Braman v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Thompson, T. v. Thompson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In Re Canoe Manufacturing Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.