Commonwealth v. Adams
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
GANTMAN, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, William L. Adams, III, appeals pro se 1 from the judgment of sentence of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, which adjudicated Appellant guilty of criminal mischief, 2 following his de novo summary appeal, and imposed a fine plus restitution in the amount of $592.00. Appellant asks us to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction for criminal mischief. We hold the evidence was sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction. Accordingly, we affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BullickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. GoodingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3Cited by259 opinions
- In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. TchirkowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. AndrulewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Wilkins v. MarsicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Kern v. KernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.