Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2005PublishedCited by 259 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, William L. Adams, III, appeals pro se 1 from the judgment of sentence of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, which adjudicated Appellant guilty of criminal mischief, 2 following his de novo summary appeal, and imposed a fine plus restitution in the amount of $592.00. Appellant asks us to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction for criminal mischief. We hold the evidence was sufficient to support Appellant’s conviction. Accordingly, we affirm.

¶ 2 The trial court opinion sets forth the relevant facts and procedural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BullickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. GoodingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by259 opinions

  1. In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. TchirkowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. AndrulewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Wilkins v. MarsicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Kern v. KernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API