Commonwealth v. Muroski
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
We are here called upon to determine whether a private complainant has standing to appeal from a trial court order sustaining the disapproval1 by the district attorney of a private criminal complaint and, if so, whether, in the instant case, the trial court abused its discretion or committed an error of law by concluding that the district attorney properly exercised his discretion in disapproving the private criminal complaint filed by appellant.
Appellant, James Page, an inmate at the Huntingdon State Correctional Institution, filed a private criminal complaint against Chester…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MalloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. EisemannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. EisemannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kroen v. Bedway Security Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. JurySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.