Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Malloy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1982No. 1999 and 2002PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This case raises the novel issue of whether the victim of an alleged crime has standing to appeal, without the consent of the district attorney, a judicial determination dismissing a complaint for the prosecution’s failure to establish a prima facie case. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that a victim/complainant lacks the authority and power to appeal and, therefore, this appeal must be quashed.

On February 20, 1980, private criminal complaints were executed by David Rosen of the appellant corporation, Paula-Arlen Vending Machine Co. (hereinafter “appellant”), against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. PfaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Kroen v. Bedway Security Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. JurySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API