Legal Opinion

Erkess v. Eisenthal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1946No. Appeal, 55PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is a bill in equity by Walter Erkess, appellee, to compel George Eisenthal and Miriam Eisenthal, his wife, appellants, to specifically perform a written contract for the sale of real estate. The chancellor granted the relief prayed for. This appeal is .from the refusal of the court below to sustain exceptions to his findings and to the decree nisi.

George Eisenthal and Miriam Eisenthal, appellants, by an agreement dated August 10,1944, agreed to convey certain described premises to Walter Erkess, appellee, for $4,500.-■ The- contract provided, inter alia,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Schaeffer v. ColdrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Unatin 7-Up Co., Inc. v. SolomonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Loughney v. QuigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Salley v. Option One Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Detwiler v. CaponeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Suchan Et Ux. v. SwopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Hayes v. AltmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Nuzum Et Ux. v. SpriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API