Legal Opinion

Nuzum Et Ux. v. Spriggs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1947No. Appeal, 182PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

J. M. Nuzum and Ruth P. Nuzum, appellees, filed this bill in equity against Margaret Spriggs, Ada M. Spriggs, and Lucian A. Spriggs, executors, substituted for Alice M. Spriggs, deceased, to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate entered into between appellees and Lane & Fetherin, agents for Alice M. Spriggs. Preliminary objections asserting a failure to allege an enforceable contract were dismissed and an answer was filed admitting the averments of the bill. The only evidence adduced at the hearing was the admitted averments of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erkess v. EisenthalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Cardon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ReifsneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Fierst v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Darlington v. County of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Petersen Ex Rel. Morrison v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Casey v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API