Zerr v. HECETA LODGE NO. 111, IND. ORDER OF ODD F.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action to recover the possession of real property to compel, by writ of restitution, the removal of an adjacent building owned by defendant to the extent that it encroaches upon plaintiffs’ property.
Defendant’s answer alleged various equitable defenses, including the defense that equity should deny plaintiffs’ request for removal of the encroachment because to do so would impose upon defendant a “disproportionate burden.” Defendant’s answer also alleged the defenses of estoppel, reformation and rescission. In addition, defendant contends that a writ of restitution is not a proper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Jensen v. ProbertOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Winthers v. BertrandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- McKee v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Amkco, Ltd., Co. v. WelbornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Sutherlin School District 130 v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Proctor v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Proctor v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.