Legal Opinion
Amkco, Ltd., Co. v. Welborn
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 2001No. 25,820PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANCHINI, Justice.
{1} Petitioners Amkco, Ltd., Keeling Petroleum, Inc., and Keeling Distributing, Inc., appeal from a Court of Appeals’ opinion requiring Petitioners to remove a portion of a gas station that was constructed on a fifty-eight foot strip of land belonging to Respondent Welborn. In so doing, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s application of the relative hardship doctrine. We now reverse the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court to allow Respondent to choose one of three remedies.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
{2} Petitioners are entities controlled by Keeling, a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Christensen v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Padilla v. LawrenceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dixon v. ThatcherNevada Supreme Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Collado v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- El Dorado Utilities, Inc. v. Eldorado Area Water & Sanitation DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.