Legal Opinion
State v. Grogan
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2007No. 29,513PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} After a jury trial in which Defendant Stanley Grogan was convicted of two counts of great bodily harm by vehicle, the trial court, on its owm motion, ordered a new trial based on its determination that Defendant did not receive a fair trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing to allow the State an opportunity to rebut the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel. We reverse the Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. BernalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Dylan J.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. CordovaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kerr v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.