Legal Opinion

State v. Schoonmaker

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2008No. 28,954PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} Defendant Jake Sehoonmaker was charged with child abuse resulting in great bodily harm. Though he was declared indigent, and thus qualified for representation by the public defender’s office, Defendant’s family raised enough funds to retain private counsel to represent him. However, neither Defendant nor his family could afford to pay for expert witnesses that were essential to his defense. Given no alternative, defense counsel tried unsuccessfully to withdraw in favor of the public defender so that, with public financing, his client could put on an adequate…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Ex Parte BriggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. ConsaulNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API