Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Parsons

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2016No. 35,421PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAKAMURA, Justice.

{1} On petition for a writ of superintending control, we are called upon to review an order issued by the Twelfth Judicial District Court in the criminal prosecutions against Santiago Carrillo. The district court’s order held that the flat-fee rates paid to indigent defense contract counsel by the Law Office of the Public D efender (LOPD) contravened the right to counsel and nullified the Legislature’s prohibition of the payment of hourly rates to contract counsel. The district court also issued a remedial order directing the LOPD to pay every contract attorney no…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lujan Grisham v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API