Legal Opinion

State v. Bernal

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2006No. 29,183PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Chief Justice.

{1} In this direct appeal from Defendant’s conviction of felony murder, attempted armed robbery, and several other crimes, Defendant presents certain double jeopardy arguments, challenging his attempted armed robbery conviction as being the predicate for his felony murder conviction. In the course of addressing those arguments, we decide, for the first time, whether the single-larceny doctrine applies to the crime of attempted armed robbery. Addressing that issue and others regarding double jeopardy, as well as Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. FrazierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. ArrendondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API