Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Montgomery

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. 92C-10877; CA A82542PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*173EDMONDS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict for defendant in this medical malpractice action. Because the trial court erred when it refused to allow plaintiffs expert witness to testify as to her opinion about the medical causation of plaintiff’s condition, we reverse.

In 1991, defendant, a dentist, treated plaintiff for a toothache. He used nitrous oxide to relieve plaintiffs pain and to help her relax while he worked on her teeth. Plaintiff testified that, as she began breathing the gas, she felt as though she were “being sucked into a black hole.” According to plaintiff, she blacked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sandow v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Creasey v. HoganOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Barrett v. Coast Range PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hass v. Port of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landers v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Bennett v. RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Means v. GatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Rugemer v. RheaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API