Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Coast Range Plywood
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1983No. WCB 81-03112, CA A24457, SC 29076PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
We accepted review in this workers’ compensation case to consider language in the Workers’ Compensation Board’s opinion which states:
“The Referee found that there was no evidence to show that the functional component is not injury related. That may be true but irrelevant as the burden is on claimant to prove causal relationship. Claimant never did have a psychological evaluation even though numerous physicians diagnosed functional overlay. Therefore this record is devoid of any proof that claimant’s psychological component is injury-related or permanent in nature. We will not consider that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Balestri v. Terminal Freight Cooperative Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Terwilliger v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Trees v. OrdonezOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Schacher v. DunneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.