Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Richmond
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 2012No. 20S03-1105-CV-293PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it permitted a psychologist to testify on behalf of a plaintiff in a personal injury case as to the cause of a brain injury. 1 Finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in this regard, we affirm.
Background
In May, 2004, Henry Bennett, while operating a roll-off container truck for Schu-pan & Sons, Inc. (referred to collectively as “Bennett”), rear-ended John Richmond’s vehicle. Bennett’s truck weighed 42,000 pounds; Richmond was driving a van. In December, 2005, Richmond and his…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Savage v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Ashley T. Tucker v. Michelle R. Harrison, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Mildred Borgwald v. Old National Bank and Raelynn PoundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Mary and Ronald McDaniel, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Christopher L. McDaniel v. Stephen W. Robertson, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Insurance (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Reginald N. Person, Jr. v. Carol A. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.