Rugemer v. Rhea
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict upholding a release agreement. In the first stage of a bifurcated trial, the jury concluded that plaintiff was bound by a release agreement that he had entered into with defendant’s insurer and thus was precluded from recovering damages. On appeal, plaintiff claims that the trial judge erred in granting defendant’s two motions in limine, the first to exclude evidence of the extent of plaintiffs personal injuries and the second to exclude evidence of the insurance adjuster’s conduct with respect to another claimant involved in the same…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. McGinnisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- People v. ZackowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Murray v. LaugsandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Masood v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Graves v. TullenersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.