Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Maresca

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 24, 1989No. 60,824; NMCM 87 0006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*329 Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This is another case in which an accused seeks dismissal of charges against him because the Government did not bring him to trial within 120 days.1 See RCM 707(a), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984. We granted two issues for review. The issues, as framed by appellant, are as follows:

I

WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT’S ACCOUNTABILITY FOR TIME PURSUANT TO RULE FOR COURT-MARTIAL 707 BEGAN ON THE DATE THE GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE DELIVERED THE PREFERRED CHARGE SHEET TO THE APPELLANT’S DEFENSE COUNSEL WHO, IN TURN, INFORMED THE APPELLANT OF THE NATURE OF THE…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. BrowersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. CarlisleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. SchilfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. LonghoferUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. RamseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. UriosteguiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. MicklaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API