Legal Opinion

Repanich v. Columbia & Northern Fishing & Packing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1925No. 19212. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This is an action to recover from appellant the value of certain fish alleged in two causes of action to have been sold to it through one Banich as its agent. The complaint originally alleged that the sale was made to appellant; then by amendment the sale to appellant’s agent, Banich; then by a further amendment during the trial of the case certain facts alleged to constitute estoppel to deny the agency, of Banich are pleaded to the effect that certain instructions of appellant were given out to deliver fish subsequent to August 10, 1921, to a scow belonging to it in Ilwaco, and that three…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Langford v. IssenhuthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Eyers v. Burbank Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. O'Daniel v. StreebyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Lemcke v. Funk & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Driver v. GallandWashington Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rupert v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Crown v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Switzer v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API