Lemcke v. Funk & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 8, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The plaintiff, George Lemcke, doing business as Guaranty Investment Company, brought this action to recover $493.50, being one-half of commissions received by defendants for negotiating an exchange of certain properties. The jury returned a verdict in his favor as against both defendants. The court granted a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict as to the defendant Benson, but entered judgment on the verdict as against the defendant A. L. Funk & Company. That defendant appeals.
There was evidence tending to establish facts as follows: In June, 1911, one Mrs. McOmber was a saleswoman…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Leslie v. . Knickerbocker Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Eagle Iron Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. LaMon v. Town of WestportWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Lundberg v. BaumgartnerWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Jameson v. First Savings Bank & Trust Co. of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.