Switzer v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— This action brought by respondent, a minor, by her guardian ad litem, grew out of injuries received by her in being struck by a street car operated by the city, which owns and operates a municipal railway system in Seattle. This appeal is from a substantial verdict and judgment thereon after motions for judgment n. o. v. or, in the alternative, for a new. trial, had been denied in the second trial of the cause. The first trial resulted in a mistrial because of the disagreement of the jury.
As a part of the municipal street railway system of Seattle, it maintains a double-track street railway…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Locke v. Puget Sound International Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Zettler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. DaltonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Harringer v. KeenanWashington Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Crown v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Isaacs v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Hohman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Isaacs v. NAT. BK. OF COMMERCE OF SEATTLEWashington Supreme Court · 1957