Legal Opinion

Switzer v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1930No. 22680. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action brought by respondent, a minor, by her guardian ad litem, grew out of injuries received by her in being struck by a street car operated by the city, which owns and operates a municipal railway system in Seattle. This appeal is from a substantial verdict and judgment thereon after motions for judgment n. o. v. or, in the alternative, for a new. trial, had been denied in the second trial of the cause. The first trial resulted in a mistrial because of the disagreement of the jury.

As a part of the municipal street railway system of Seattle, it maintains a double-track street railway…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Locke v. Puget Sound International Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Zettler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. DaltonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Harringer v. KeenanWashington Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Crown v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Isaacs v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hohman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Isaacs v. NAT. BK. OF COMMERCE OF SEATTLEWashington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API