Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Beede
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 3, 1924No. 1636PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding in which priority of invention was awarded the party Beede. The issue is expressed in 12 counts, of which the first, fifth, and eleventh ^re-sufficiently illustrative:
“1. The combination of a spindle, a supporting base, a ball hearing supported by said base and supporting said spindle, and an element connected with the spindle adapted to receive a driving band and arranged in the same plane with said hall bearing, the step or foot of the spindle being capable of lateral cushioned movement.”
“5. A…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Splitdorf Electrical Co. v. Webster Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- Wells v. HonigmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
- Replogle v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Corbett v. ChisholmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- John D. Rieser v. William A. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Jenks v. KnightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Charles J. Stalego and Wendell W. Drummond v. Pierre Rene Heymes and Ivan PeychesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.