Legal Opinion
Regents of the University of California v. University of Iowa Research Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 17, 2006No. 2005-1374PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the Board) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO) resolved this interference between the Regents of the University of California (California) as the senior party and the University of Iowa Research Foundation, Coley Pharmaceutical Group, Inc., and the United States (collectively, Iowa) as the junior party. The Board granted Iowa’s motion for judgment that 35 U.S.C. § 135(b)(1) barred California’s sole claim interfering with Iowa’s U.S. Patent No. 6,207,646 (the ’646 patent). Univ. of Iowa Research Found.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corbett v. ChisholmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Cryns v. MusherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Phillip W. Berman, Timothy J. Gregory, Laurence A. Lasky, Gerald R. Nakamura, Eric J. Patzer, John S. Patton, and Ellen S. Vitetta v. Gerard M. HouseyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Thompson v. HamiltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In Re Kenneth L. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis GmbhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Adair v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Cytologic, Inc. v. Biopheresis GmbhDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- The Regents Of The University Of California v. University Of Iowa Research FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006