Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Covil Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 2, 1987No. 22664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

This is a worker’s compensation case. The Hearing Commissioner denied respondent’s (Employee’s) claim and the Commission affirmed the denial. On appeal the Circuit Court reversed the Commission’s order and remanded the case for a hearing on the merits. We affirm.

Employee filed this claim to recover benefits for total disability caused by pulmonary asbestosis allegedly contracted as a result of his on-the-job exposure to asbestos. Appellants (Employers) contend the claim was not timely filed. We disagree.

Employee was definitively diagnosed and informed in August 1979 that he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. White v. Orr-Lyons MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Johnson v. DaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Solomon v. W.B. Easton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. McCraw v. Mary Black HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API