Legal Opinion

Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1962No. 17962PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

This case involves a claim by the respondent-employee for benefits under the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act for total and permanent disability resulting from an occupational disease. The claim of the respondent was resisted before the Industrial Commission on the grounds that (1) timely notice of her claim had not been given as required by Sections 72-301 and 72-303 of the 1952 Code of Laws and (2) the disability of the respondent did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. 'The Industrial Commission decided both issues in favor of the respondent, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cole v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Glenn v. Columbia Silica Sand Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Gray v. LAURENS MILLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Harpe v. KLINE IRON & METAL WORKSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Shillinglaw v. Springs Cotton MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Hunt v. WhittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Shealy v. Algernon Blair, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Merchants Mutual Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  5. Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API