Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 8, 1985No. 0535PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a workers’ compensation case. In a decision affirmed by the full Industrial Commission and the circuit court, the single commissioner found the respondent Charles Hanks to be totally disabled from an occupational disease. The commissioner ordered Hanks’ employer, appellant Blair Mills, and its carrier, appellant Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, to pay benefits to Hanks. We affirm.

Hanks has a long history of employment in cotton mills and of exposure to cotton dust. In 1946, at the age of sixteen, Hanks began working at Abney Mills as a sweeper in the spinning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Arnold v. Benjamin Booth Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  4. Glenn v. Columbia Silica Sand Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Teigue v. Appleton Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Geathers v. 3V, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API