Ramudit v. Fifth Third Bank, Unpublished Decision (2-4-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Goomtie Ramudit, filed a charge of discrimination with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission in which she alleged that defendant-appellee, Fifth Third Bank, had disciplined her on the basis of her national origin. Subsequently, the commission issued a decision finding that it was "not probable" that Fifth Third had "engaged in practices unlawful under Section 4112, Ohio Revised Code" and dismissing the case.
{¶ 2} Ramudit then filed a two-count complaint against Fifth Third in the court of common pleas. Count one of the complaint alleged that Fifth Third had…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dickinson v. Zanesville Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Muhammad v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- La Riccia v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023