Legal Opinion

Ramudit v. Fifth Third Bank, Unpublished Decision (2-4-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 2005No. C-030941UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Goomtie Ramudit, filed a charge of discrimination with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission in which she alleged that defendant-appellee, Fifth Third Bank, had disciplined her on the basis of her national origin. Subsequently, the commission issued a decision finding that it was "not probable" that Fifth Third had "engaged in practices unlawful under Section 4112, Ohio Revised Code" and dismissing the case.

{¶ 2} Ramudit then filed a two-count complaint against Fifth Third in the court of common pleas. Count one of the complaint alleged that Fifth Third had…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. O'Brien v. AngleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Zanesville Metropolitan Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Muhammad v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. La Riccia v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API