Legal Opinion
Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1983No. CA A23460, SC 29001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, C. J.
Does an employer who challenges a Workers’ Compensation Board’s holding that a claim is compensable initiate an appeal within the meaning of ORS 656.382(2) where that challenge takes the form of a cross-appeal to an appeal by the claimant, requesting an award of attorney fees? ORS 656.382(2) provides:
“If a request for hearing, request for review or court appeal is initiated by an employer or insurer, and the referee, board or court finds that the compensation awarded to a claimant should not be disallowed or reduced, the employer or insurer shall be required to pay to the claimant or the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CurryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Littleton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Saiville v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.