Legal Opinion

Teel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1983No. CA A23460, SC 29001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, C. J.

Does an employer who challenges a Workers’ Compensation Board’s holding that a claim is compensable initiate an appeal within the meaning of ORS 656.382(2) where that challenge takes the form of a cross-appeal to an appeal by the claimant, requesting an award of attorney fees? ORS 656.382(2) provides:

“If a request for hearing, request for review or court appeal is initiated by an employer or insurer, and the referee, board or court finds that the compensation awarded to a claimant should not be disallowed or reduced, the employer or insurer shall be required to pay to the claimant or the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. CurryOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Littleton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Saiville v. EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API