Legal Opinion

Neely v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1979No. 77-7056, CA 14202PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this workers compensation case, claimant seeks eversal of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board which denied his claim on the ground that laimant’s present condition was not the result of his vork related injury.

On January 2, 1968, when he was 21 years old, laimant suffered a back injury while working as a agger. He received no permanent disability award and e did not appeal that Determination Order. In 1970 te had a back strain with considerable functional verlay and in 1971 he reinjured his back in a surfing ccident.

In January of 1976, while working as a truck driv-r, claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Francoeur v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. McManus v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Robertson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell v. A & D TerminalsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Miller v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Matter of Compensation of BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Anderson v. West Union Village SquareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API