Legal Opinion

State v. Oreskovich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 2018No. A18-0193PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

the conditions in paragraphs (1) through (3) are met:(1) The offender was under one of the following custody statuses:(i) probation;(ii) parole;(iii) supervised release;(iv) conditional release following release from an executed prison sentence (see conditional release terms listed in section 2.E.3);(v) release pending sentencing;(vi) confinement in a jail, workhouse, or prison pending or after sentencing; or(vii) escape from confinement following an executed sentence.(2) The offender was under one of the custody statuses in paragraph (1) after entry of a guilty plea, guilty verdict, or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. State v. BoeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State v. StilldayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API