Legal Opinion

Marx v. Lenske

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The only issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow certain attorney fees.

The genesis of this complicated and protracted litigation occurred in 1963 when Reuben and Rose Lenske conveyed certain real property in trust to Gunther Krause, formerly an attorney practicing in Portland and the senior member of the law partnership of Krause, Lindsay and Nahstoll. The trust was to secure Lenske’s indebtedness to William Marx, a certified public accountant, for Ms services in connection with a criminal tax fraud prosecution pending against Lenske. Krause was also attorney…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beers v. Beers, AdministratrixOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Levins v. StakeOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Keerins Bros. v. MauneyOregon Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kemp v. MurrayUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Berger Farms v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Lamb Bros., Inc. v. First State BankOregon Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API