Legal Opinion
Blohm v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1955No. 1598PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
On this appeal, from a conviction of practicing optometry without a license, our first task is to consider the Government’s motion to dismiss. In that motion the contention is made that “the judgment appealed from is non-existent”; that although the trial judge had orally pronounced sentence upon the defendant, he later revoked that sentence, and suspending the imposition of a new sentence, placed defendant on probation; and that by accepting probation defendant waived his right of appeal. It is true that the District of Columbia Probation Act, Code 1951, § 24-101 et seq.,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. DebrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Goodall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Fields v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Langley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- Underwriters Construction Co. ex rel. Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961