Legal Opinion
United States v. Debrow
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 30, 1953No. 51PublishedCited by 450 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Minton
The respondents here, defendants below, were charged by separate indictments with the crime of perjury, as defined in 18 U. S. C. § 1621. Each indictment read in material part as follows:
“[T]he defendant herein, having duly taken an oath before a competent tribunal, to wit: a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments known as the Subcommittee on Investigations, a duly created and authorized subcommittee of the United States Senate conducting official hearings in the Southern District of Mississippi, and inquiring in a matter then and there pending…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Robertson v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. Debrow. United States v. Wilkinson. United States v. Brashier. United States v. Rogers. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
3Cited by450 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
445 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.