Hale v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN; Associate Judge.
James Hale was convicted by a jury of simple assault. 1 His assignments of error relate to alleged remarks of the trial judge in the presence of the jury and to the adequacy of the instructions given to the jury.
The record indicates that the trial judge interrupted the testimony of the Government’s first witness, the complainant, in order to call a court reporter. The statement of proceedings and evidence states that the trial judge further “ * * * explained it would not condone perjury.” We find no abuse of discretion in the calling of the court reporter, nor do we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Leroy Payton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Stassi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Wyche v. United States. Thorpe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Felton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Love v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Cooper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956