Legal Opinion

Underwriters Construction Co. ex rel. Johnson v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1961No. 2732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Retired Judge.

Appellants were convicted and fined for two violations of the Real' Estate and Business Brokers’ License Act.1 This statute makes it unlawful to act as a real-estate broker without a license, and defines such broker as anyone engaged in the business of erecting houses or causing the erection for sale on his land, and sells or offers them for sale, “or who, as owner or otherwise * * * sells, * * * offers or attempts to sell or to negotiate the sale of any lot or lots in any subdivision of land comprising ten lots or more * * *.”2 The government presented evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Robles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Blohm v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. RDP Development Corp. v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API