Legal Opinion

Bieber v. State Bank of Terry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 1991No. 90-35551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

The district court, finding that none of the transactions between the plaintiffs and the defendant bank amounted to illegal tying under the Bank Holding Company Act, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We agree that the facts alleged were insufficient to support plaintiffs’ federal claims.

I

The plaintiffs own and operate two Montana ranches: Skull Creek Ranch, Inc. (SCR) and Bieber Land and Cattle, Inc. (BLC). Leroy and Linda Bieber actively operate and are the sole shareholders and officers of SCR. Scott Bieber, their son, has been active in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LinnDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. NCNB Texas National Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Alpine Electric Company, a Missouri Corporation Raymond Salva Linda Shelton v. Union Bank, a State Banking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. K3C Inc. v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. New England Co. v. Bank of Gwinnett CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
  5. Alpine Electric Co. v. Union BankDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API