Pennycuff v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
A jury found appellant Terry Pennyceuff guilty on two counts of incest, three counts of child molesting, and one count of sexual misconduct with a minor for carrying on a sexual relationship with his teenage daughter over a three-year period. The Court of Appeals ordered a new trial, holding that Pennycuff's lawyer was ineffective for failing to object to evidence that violated Pen-nycuff's rights under Doyle v. Ohio.1 Pennycuff v. State, 727 N.E.2d 723 (Ind.Ct. App.2000).
We conclude that the caselaw points to a different outcome.
How Pennycuff's Trial Unfolded
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Alton R. FairchildCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Bellmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- French v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Serino v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Benefield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Schmidt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Ian McCullough v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.