Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2004No. 29A05-0312-CR-666PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In May 2002, the State charged Christopher Schmidt with one count of Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated ("OWI"), as a Class A misdemeanor, and one count of OWI, as a Class C misdemeanor. By separate information, the State charged Schmidt with two counts of OWI, both as Class D felonies, based on a prior OWI conviction. In the first part of Schmidt's bifurcated trial, the jury found him guilty of OWI, as a Class A misdemeanor, and OWI, as a Class C misdemeanor. Schmidt waived his right to a jury trial on the enhancement phase, and the trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Pirtle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Benson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Commitment of M.M. v. Clarian Health PartnersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Datzek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Garcia-Torres v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Ham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API