Legal Opinion

United States v. Alton R. Fairchild

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1975No. 74-2097PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

Alton Robert Fairchild was convicted of twice violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S. C. § 2313. 1 He now complains (1) that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a jury finding that he knew that the cars which he had received were stolen, (2) that the trial court committed error when it allowed the jury to hear testimony that he stood silent after he had been read his Miranda 2 warnings and (3) that plain error was committed when the United States Attorney, in his summation, made a comment which implied that Fairchild’s failure to make a statement after his arrest…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Victor Hassine v. Charles Zimmerman, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Edwin Charles Fortes, Jr., United States of America v. Sandra Elaine JemisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API