Legal Opinion

French v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2002No. 03S00-9911-CR-661PublishedCited by 187 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

In this consolidated appeal, Roman Lamont French challenges both his conviction for cocaine dealing and the denial of post-conviction relief. We hold: (1) French was not denied due process when he appeared, without objection, wearing jail garb in front of a new jury during the habitual offender proceeding; (2) although it is error to require a defendant to appear in jail garb at a habitual offender proceeding, it does not require reversal where no objection was raised; (3) the evidence at the habitual offender proceeding was sufficient to identify French as the person convicted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by187 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Naveed Gulzar v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API