French v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, Roman Lamont French challenges both his conviction for cocaine dealing and the denial of post-conviction relief. We hold: (1) French was not denied due process when he appeared, without objection, wearing jail garb in front of a new jury during the habitual offender proceeding; (2) although it is error to require a defendant to appear in jail garb at a habitual offender proceeding, it does not require reversal where no objection was raised; (3) the evidence at the habitual offender proceeding was sufficient to identify French as the person convicted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by187 opinions
- Henley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- William Hinesley, III v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Naveed Gulzar v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.