Legal Opinion

Benefield v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 2011No. 41A01-1006-PC-310PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Gloria Benefield presented a document at a job interview showing that she was certified as a Qualified Medication Aide (“QMA”). It was later discovered that she was not QMA certified. Benefield was charged with and convicted of class C felony forgery and with being an habitual offender. She appealed, arguing, inter alia, that jury instruction 6 improperly defined “defraud” and created fundamental error. Another panel of this court concluded that although jury instruction 6 improperly defined “defraud,” it did not rise to the level of fundamental…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ben-Yisrayl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Massey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. John R. Myers II v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Dorian Lee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Chad Thomas Burnell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Michael Williams, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API