Legal Opinion

Condren v. Marlin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1925No. 13740PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Louisa Lewallen was a citizen of the Creek Tribe of Indians of the one-fourth blood. On August 21, 19001, she and John Lewallen were duly married. John Lewallen was a white man, a noncitizen of the Creek Nation not of Indian blood or descent. After the marriage of Louisa Lewallen and John Lewallen, the land which is the subject-matter of this action was duly selected by and allotted to said Louisa Lewallen and allotment patents or deeds were issued, approved, and delivered, after which said Louisa Lewallen and John Lewallen, while living together as husband and wife, moved upon said land and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. SweeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Johnson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. In Re Byford's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Kenoly v. HawleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Pierce v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marlin v. LewallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. In Re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Latimer v. VandersliceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Zdanowich v. SherwoodConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  5. Derrisaw v. SchafferDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API