Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 5489PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Murray County; R: McMillan, Judge. Action by Geo. H. Pierce and others against D. F. Ellis and others. From the judgment, the parties first mentioned 'bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREÍWER, C.

Nannie Rogers, a Chickasaw Indian by blood, married John Rogers, a white man. One child was born alive of this issue, and prior to statehood Nannie Rogers received an allotment of the lands of her tribe, then died intestate, without having disposed of the lands, leaving surviving her the child and her said husband. The child died later. The only question involved, as admitted in the briefs, is: Did the surviving husband, upon the death of the wife, take an estate by curtesy in her lands? So far as this court is concerned, we do not consider the question now an open one.

In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Armstrong v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morris v. SweeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Kenoly v. HawleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Condren v. MarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Bridges v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Longest v. LangfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API