Legal Opinion
Latimer v. Vanderslice
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1936No. 26672PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
On the 12th day of October, 1915', this court rendered an opinion in Pierce v. Ellis, 51 Okla. 710, 152 P. 340. The action involved lands left by Nannie Rogers, a Chickasaw Indian, whose husband was John Rogers, and it is stated that the only question involved was, Did the surviving husband upon the death of the wife take any estate by curtesy?
The opinion continues:
“So far as this court is concerned, we do not consider the question now an open one.
“In the case of Johnson v. Simpson, 40 Okla. 413, 139 P. 129, the syllabus is…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Roth v. Union Nat. Bank of BartlesvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Leese v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- National Zinc Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969