Legal Opinion

Kenoly v. Hawley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1921No. 10170PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. • Action in ejectment by Isabel Kenoly and another against Sam. L. Hawley and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

On the 28th day of June, 1917, plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, began two actions in ejectment in the district court of Okmulgee county. Parties will hereafter be known as plaintiffs and defendants.

The source of title was the same, the right of recovery the same, and the only difference was as to parties and description of the land. These causes were consolidated in the court below and were heard together. All parties claimed title from the same common source.

Nancy Williams was a Greek freedman citizen, and as such was duly enrolled by the Dawes Commission under the Curtis Act, which…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Ballinger v. United States Ex Rel. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Foreman v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Henry J. Heryey & Co. v. EdmundsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Lewis v. ClementsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Faulkner v. KirkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. He-Ah-To-Me v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Condren v. MarlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API