Legal Opinion
Landucci v. State Farm Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 12, 2014No. Case No.: 5:14-cv-00789-LHKPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS1
LÚCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Melissa Landucci (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants State Farm Insurance Company (“State Farm”), David Colker, and Does 1 through 25 (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs third through seventh causes of action: hostile work environment, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of implied contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Tam v. Qualcomm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical ProgressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Olivares v. Dason (In re Dason)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Adams v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Alan M. Blassberg v. Lhakpa Sherpa, Netflix, Inc., SK Global Entertainment, Inc., Avocado & Coconuts Productions, LLC, MakeMake, LLC and OBB Media, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.