Legal Opinion
Tam v. Qualcomm, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 16, 2018No. Case No.: 17–CV–710 JLS (AGS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is Defendant Qualcomm Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, ("MTD," ECF No. 5-1). Also before the Court are Plaintiff Kam T. Tam's Response in Opposition to, ("Opp'n," ECF No. 6), and Defendant's Reply in Support of, ("Reply," ECF No. 7), Defendant's MTD. The Court vacated the hearing on the motion and took the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 8.) After considering the parties' arguments and the law, the Court GRANTS Defendant's MTD.
BACKGROUND
This case arises from…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barr v. Laboratory Corporation of America HoldingsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- De Souza v. Dawson Technical, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Esterhay v. Ten Oaks Management, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Howe v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Lapchak v. Paradigm Biopharmaceuticals (USA), Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.